Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Homemade Chicken Stock: Slow Cooker and Single Diner Style

I have been using my slow cooker non-stop lately. I have a Vitaclay, which has a clay bowl. It is a natural material that is also naturally non-stick, a lovely alternative to ones that contain teflon or lead. I have a small, 6 cup one which is great for one or two people. Generally if I make dinner for myself and fill the pot all the way, I have plenty left over for the next day as well. Neither my husband or I have set schedules and he has been very busy with grad school lately that we do not always eat dinner together or at the same time; so some nights I eat alone and some nights with him, but the slow cooker is perfect for either. I have been making a lot of dinners composed of just veggies and protein in it. Basically just throwing cut up veggies, any combination I have, and adding protein on top. It is great for a number of reasons. It is the ultimate lazy dinner, as it takes very little time to prepare and only uses up a couple of dishes. I have never been one for cutting veggies evenly or developing my knife skills at all, and you don't really have to with this method. For the most part, you can cut as haphazardly as you want, making sure tougher veggies are small enough to keep up with the non-tough ones. The combinations are endless and pretty risk-free, as the flavors blend together much more than they would if everything was cooked separate. I also love the texture of the prepared foods. The way mine have turned out so far (I am sure I could experiment more and keep the veggies a little less tender), the veggies and meats are very very soft. However, they are so much more flavorful than they would be otherwise because everything is contained in the pot, making it impossible for flavor to escape. All the liquid is contained in the pot as well, and I make sure to consume all of it together to retain all the nurtrients that would be lost with other cooking methods. However, the most important thing I have made so far with my slow-cooker is home-made chicken stock. 

I could do a whole post on why you should make chicken-stock and why it is so good for you (maybe I will?), but I think for the most part it is a given. What most people might not know is the BIG problem with store bought chicken stock. They can contain added sugar, flavorings or MSG (natural flavor is an acceptable term for MSG also). They are also always pasteurized, which kills any heat sensitive vitamins. They also do not taste great and it is impossible to trace where the chicken came from that was used for it. There are of course some great recipes and "how to" guides for chicken stock from various sources, but mine is a little different because it is adapted for small spaces and single diners. 

I use left-over chicken bones from dinners I make regularly. Since I tend to buy small cuts of chicken, like wings or thighs, these tend to be small but plentiful. Larger bones contain more nutrition, and using a whole carcass is ideal; but this way works well too, and I figure as long as I consume it regularly I am getting plenty of added nutrients to my overall diet. I usually freeze the bones as I go, in either glass or plastic, and make the stock when I have enough. When I am ready, I throw the bones in the slow-cooker pot. Than I add whatever veggies I want. I think carrots and celery are always good basics. Also, any non-sulfer veggie can be thrown in. The sulfur veggies, like broccoli, tend to have an overpowering flavor when used for stock. The great thing is that you can use veggies that are just past their prime, like some wilted kale that you do not think will saute up nice. Add some garlic cloves, no need to chop, and some course cut up onion if you want. Next, I add some spices of my choosing. Lots of herbs and some cayenne pepper, as we like things spicy around here. And don't forget to add a good amount of sea salt and some apple cider vinegar, just a small splash, to help draw the nutrients out of the bones. Add pure water to just under the lid. The first time I did this, I ended up having a less-flavorful stock because I added more water than bones, figuring my yield would be small; but after discovering I had much more stock than I thought I would, I ended up cutting the water significantly the next time.
Side note: Pleas forgive these horrible pictures! I am working on adding good pics to all my posts soon but for now I just wanted to have something to show so I used my cell phone camera...

I set the timer for 12 hours, which in the Vitaclay means using the "stew" setting and adding eight hours to the timer. It will stay in "warm" mode 12 hours after cooking so at most you have 24 hours to drain the liquid.

The Next day, I strain the stock through a small metal sieve while saving all the bones and veggies. Normally I add the stock to a mason jar for storage. You can also freeze it if you are not going to use it within a week. The way to make it extra frugal, and what I do, is save the bones and veggies for the next batch and just "refresh" it with a little more bones and veg and then repeat the process all over again. If you want to be REALLY frugal (who doesn't?), you can add the veg to a pureed soup after you use it for stock a couple of times. The stock I end up with is not as solid as it would be if I used a whole carcass, but like I said it still has plenty of nutrients and does become cloudy and have some solid pieces in the fridge, so I know there is some gelatin in there. You could also add chicken feet to the stock to add nutrition and still be able to use a small slow-cooker. That's it! You can then use to stock for cooking or drinking. Drinking stock with protein-rich meals helps with digestion and adds flavor and nutrition. Yummy!


http://www.westonaprice.org/childrens-health/slow-cooker-rules
http://www.westonaprice.org/food-features/why-broth-is-beautiful
http://www.thenourishinggourmet.com/2011/09/bone-broth-take-frugal-to-a-new-level.html





Thursday, July 19, 2012

Great Lessons I've Learned: Phytic Acid

When I started on a path towards "Real Food" a few years ago, one of the most important discoveries I made was the necessity to soak beans and grains, and sometimes nuts, to make them more easily digestible and to release vital nutrients. I do not plan on having a lot of "basics" explanation on this blog, mostly because there are so many wonderful explanations on other blogs already. However, I thought I would share my experience with soaking grains and beans because few other changes have had such a profound impact on my health.

Grains and beans are sprouted or fermented to remove a variety of compounds that make them hard to digest and that make the nutrients in them hard to absorb. Some of these compounds are; phytic acid, lectins, enzyme inhibitors, and gluten. I would like to focus on phytates because they are written about and debated a lot, and there have been many studies done that focus on them. 

What are phytates?
Phytates, or phytic acid is the storage form of phosphorus in many plants. Phytic acid not only binds the phosphorus in the plant, but will also bind with other minerals such as; iron, calcium, zinc and magnesium which makes them unavailable for absorption during digestion. According to Ramiel Nagel, who has become an expert on phytic acid, it also binds important enzymes required for the digestion of proteins and carbohydrates. In addition to phytic acid, grains and seeds also contain enzyme inhibitors which can also be neutralized by soaking or sprouting.

Mark's Daily Apple has a really good explanation of why people soak, sprout or ferment grains, as well as some good study links here:


Also a discussion of whether fermentation is traditional is here on The Nourishing Gourmet:


Fermentation is also supported and discussed in Nourishing Traditions, which tends to serve as an intro for many people to traditional diets so I think it is safe to say many people learn about it there first.

"The well meaning advice of many nutritionists, to consume whole grains as our ancestors did and not refined flours and polished rice, is misleading and often harmful in its consequences; for while our ancestors ate whole grains, they did not consume them as presented in our modern cookbooks in the form of quick-rise breads, granolas, and other hastily prepared casseroles and concoctions. Our ancestors, and virtually all preindustrialized peoples, soaked or fermented their grains before making them into porridge, breads, cakes, and casseroles."
-Sally Fallon Morell, Nourishing Traditions

I like this quote because, personally, I can attest that when I was studying nutrition in school, there seemed to be some mixed feelings surrounding whole grains. I think it is safe to say that the professors and students generally felt that the 50% whole grains a day that the food guide pyramid recommends is healthy. However, there was a general sense that eating too many whole grains was something that was both unpleasent (due to the fiber), and something that most people would just be unwilling to do. Also, since nutritionists often work in hospitals or for community programs, whole grains were often considered to be unavailable. In my pre-WAPF days, I was outraged by this and thought that whole grains should be the only type of grain promoted and consumed (of course this was partially why my digestion was a mess, more to come on that).

From what I understand (which may not be a ton, I admit), people do not really argue about whether fermenting grains reduces phytic acid. I found some good abstracts from studies that seem to confirm this.
One from a study using wheat and buttermilk (a good method for muffins and biscuits) : http://www.springerlink.com/content/uwt0kxw702857103/


And this one is really fun because it deals with sourdough bread: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf000061g

So in short, fermentation reduces phytic acid. It does this because it activates the phytase in the grains or legumes. Basically, phytase is the enzyme that "digests" phytic acid. The acidic medium serves as a warm comforting bed for the grain and it thinks that it is safe to sprout and mature into a new plant (grains either are seeds or contain them). Phytase levels vary and it is good to have a rough idea of them because it can affect fermentation time. But all it takes is a little time and an acidic medium to enjoy your grains. That being said people do seem to argue about A)whether it reduces the phytic acid and other compounds enough to warrant being able to eat the grain and B) whether we should be really be eating grains at all.

Ramiel Nagel has a really great article where he lists the phytic acid content of a lot of grains talks about experiments he has done himself, which I think definately prove the effectiveness of fermentation. 


He tends to be a little more "hardcore" about the fermentation process, which I think differs a little from the WAPF perspective. Only in that the foundation is a little more forgiving (of phytic acid maybe?) about soaking times and methods. Also, Nagel tends to even recommend sprouting and fermenting together, while the foundation generally does an either/or type of thing.

I think it is a very personal choice whether to eat grains or not, but for me, I choose to and I can say without a doubt that without fermenting first I would not be able to tolerate them nearly as well. When I was a vegetarian, my digestion became really bad. I was bloated all the time, especially after eating grains, and had flatulance frequently. I felt my intestines distended after eating, something very foreign to me now. The first time I made beans with the method of soaking in acid first, I felt amazing! I was not bloated at all and had no gas. I kept up this method and was soon baking regularly with soaked flour. I remember being amazed at how "not full" I felt after eating a muffin I had made. I actually think I overate carbs a little at first because I was so used to a full bloated feeling that a "lighter" full feeling confused me. I also switched from buying whole grain pasta to brown rice pasta, which is still high in phytic acid, but easier on the stomach (it is a once in a while treat now); and soaking brown rice, quinoa, or any other grain I wanted to have.

So for me, I would say fermenting grains (and legumes) has been a wonderful discovery and the best option for me if I want to keep consuming grains. 

The next post I will do from a more nutritional perspective on grains.






Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Losing Power, Taking a Break and Regrouping

                             http://www.freefoto.com/download/15-54-25/Storm-Clouds  


Recently, most of Baltimore lost power during a brief but crazy storm. I was one of the unlucky ones who actually did not get it back for about a week. Other times ranged from a few hours to a couple days. However, I was lucky in one way because my in-laws, who live very close, are fortunate enough to own a generator so they could provide us with a comfortable place to stay over and also a place we could bring our perishable food.

I would like to say that the time without power made me realize how much we, as people in the modern world, depend on having electricity. I heard a few people mention that they were surprised by this. I feel as though that is somewhat redundant though, and I have already becoming extremely aware of how dependent I am on modern living. However, it did make me long for having a more independent lifestyle. For example, I remember reading in one of Joel Salatin's books about the storage cellar his family has and how they have hundreds of jars of home canned goods and dried meats. They could probably live for months without power. I, however, had to forage through local grocery stores which were quickly running out of everything. I have been wanting to start home canning (eventually) and the extreme weather patterns that are happening are making me think that this is a project I need to start immediately! Bottom line, the experience did make me sad for not having a different life; and having moments like that actually make me sad in themselves because I end up feeling ungrateful for the good life I do have.

The truth is that I have been feeling a little overwhelmed lately with all the new "chores" that I find myself doing on a daily basis now. Since we have a much bigger space than we used to (and not even a whole house at that), I find myself doing exponentially more work. More cleaning and organizing, but also more cooking and food prep. I have been able to do much more than I could, but with every increase in "food quality of life" comes a decrease in my free time. Lately, I have been making slow-cooker chicken stock, homemade ice cream, and tons of soaked beans and grains (a process I have been doing for a long time, but now I can do a lot more at once and save it). Also, still maintaining my water distiller; cleaning and refilling. 

As I am writing this I am wondering if I sound very "complainy" (and after saying how I hate feeling ungrateful...ooops). But the truth is that I would not trade any of it. I love having more space. The closer my husband and I come to owning our own home, the more I realize how much I deeply want one. Homemade chicken stock is really one of the most nourishing, good-for you things you can make and an easy way to add nutrients to other dishes. And for homemade ice cream, forget it, I would not give it up for anything! I feel like I started on this path a long time ago and have to keep trucking down it, as there is no way I am turning back now. In fact I plan on just keep adding more, starting with bread making very soon.
All in all, the break from all this when the power went out was not exactly unwelcome. It made me think that I may have to incorporate some breaks in for myself along the way. For example, doing a lot of prep one week so that I don't have to the next week. Or making things in large quantities and freezing them. All things many other people do who have much busier lives than me! But alas, I am still learning. There are so many great blogs out there from people who are "doing it all" and maintaining a great home life while raising kids and/or working. There is also the other side of it, which is what I used to do, which is dealing with a small space and having to buy a lot of things and the frustration that can come with that (finding good products, high cost etc.)

So I assume we are all just figuring it out...but I would love for this to really become an advice blog and a place for people to share their struggles, so any comments would be greatly appreciated!





Friday, June 22, 2012

The True Cost of Foods

I recently came across this article about food costs in the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics daily newsletter (formerly ADA) about the cost of healthy food versus unhealthy food:


The article was a rebuttal to a study done by the academy in which they measure the cost of healthy food, not as price per calorie which has been done in the past, but as price per portion, edible weight, or cost of meeting their dietary guidelines. 
The study provides a good discussion of all four methods of measuring food cost and I think the authors make a good argument as to why studies that compare only cost per calorie were essentially useless in determining the overall healthfulness of a food. However, the study is based on a few very important and, I feel, incorrect things:

1. They assume that in order to eat healthy, one must follow either the USDA dietary guidelines or the My Pyramid guidelines (essentially the same thing in a different form)

2. Because of #1, they define "unhealthy foods" as those containing excess saturated fat, sugar or sodium.  

3. They are assuming that everyone in the country shops at a grocery store, not only that, but a "normal grocery store" ie., not one that would specialize in healthier foods, such as Whole Foods. The food prices came from a food price database, which of course would eliminate the wide range in cost of living and food prices all over the country.  

The study found that, following their guidelines, healthy foods can cost less than unhealthy or "moderation" foods as they call them. The above article was based on another study conducted around the same time. The authors of that one used food frequency questionnaires (because we all know how reliable they are) in the Seattle area and then measured the cost of each meal consumed by the participants. The idea behind that study actually makes more sense to me, but of course they are using the same guidelines for "healthy" foods. 
  
      Of course, neither of these really apply to me, or people who choose to follow a similar diet as myself. But the articles highlight what is wrong with the way we look at food cost. Besides my problems with the government's idea of healthy food, there are also other factors that affect the way we perceive food cost. For example:

1. The true cost of food, anyone who has studied factory farming or big agriculture can tell you that the cost to the land is enormous and that the cost of FF food does not reflect that cost.

2. The cost of labor, you may pay more for food from small farmers but you are supporting their family as well. Instead of buying food from places that pay their workers poorly or treat them badly, you can give that money to farmers who pay their workers a fair wage and provide a good life for them.

3. The lower cost of health care: If you eat better, you are almost guaranteed to be less sick later in life. It is one of the most simple laws of nature. Your children will benefit as well and be sick less often.

4. The authors of this study, and ones like it, and not really comparing "food" they are essentially comparing "food" with "non-food" items such as processed food. Once I started to think of those items as non-food, ie. not providing anything your body needs, these comparisons became (even more) useless.

      So if you are convinced to pay a little more for higher quality food, what is the best way to keep food costs down? Some ideas that I would like to see promoted by the government are:

1. Encouraging people to grow their own food- probably one of the most, if not the most, important thing people can learn how to do to keep food costs down. You can even promote an even more cottage mentality by encouraging neighbors to grow food together or take over city plots that have been abandoned. Growing your own herbs can add flavor to foods while eliminating the need for store bought spices.

2. The keeping of livestock or chickens- chickens need very little room, even to be considered pastured and eggs are really one the healthiest foods. Of course the meat is also nourishing, but keeping laying hens could also be just as important.

3. Cooking from scratch- In my opinion, there is no cheaper way to cook. It may take more time and energy, but there are plenty of ways to make it easier, such as slow cookers or cooking a large quantity at once.

4. Promoting foods that can be inexpensive but nutritionally dense such as butter. Butter is an incredibly healthy food, and even if you can not get the best (organic, grass-fed), you can still reap some of the benefits.


      As I have been between jobs recently, my husband and I have been trying to be very frugal in the way that we eat. We have been eating lost of chicken; unfortunately not local but organic none the less. We have been making veggies stretch further than we normally would and finding some good deals on local produce, both at Whole Foods and at local stores. We bake the chicken with spices and a little olive oil (bought in a large container at a good price) and then use the fat that drips down as a sauce for the veggies along with a little butter. This is an incredibly nourishing and satisfying meal that costs very little. I think you could even skip the olive oil and just use the chicken fat and make it even less expensive. I save the bones and make stocks in my slow cooker when I have enough, reaping even more nutrition from them. Last week we tested whether we could go without buying bread (I am going to start making my own soon but have not gotten in the habit yet), and had our local eggs in the morning with rice and beans instead. Very cheap and delicious!
      I have thought a lot about what I would do if suddenly pressed for money. I think grains would probably be the first thing to go, as I do consider them a luxury because they can be expensive and time consuming to prepare. With them would go homemade sweets. I think proteins and veggies would be most important. Buying seasonally of course helps a lot, even with meat (chickens in spring and summer, beef in winter). And of course sticking with the (I think better) cuts of meat that are very frugal, such as chicken wings and thighs. I think staying away from the grocery store would also save lots of money!

What do you do to keep food costs down and do you agree/disagree with me?

* One of my favorite bloggers keeps a healthy dollar menu on her blog, contributed to by other talented bloggers:










Sunday, June 10, 2012

Water Water Everywhere

Image courtesy of suphakit73 at FreeDigitalPhotos.net


Let me preface this post by saying that I need access to clean water...and I think all people should be as demanding as I am in that respect. I recently posted a story of the headache it took to get clean water in the home I am living in now, but why it is well worth it. Tap water contains many harmful substances. Here is a short list of things, adapted from "The Hundred Year Lie" by Randall Fitzgerald, you can probably be pretty certain are in your tap water:

Triclosan- "a chemical that reacts with chlorinated water to produce chloroform gas, which is absorbed through a person's skin or inhaled. Chloroform can cause depression, liver problems, and cancer" The FDA is conducting a re-review of triclosan due later this year.
http://www.ewg.org/triclosanguide

Teflon- Linked a birth defects and environmental problems

Perchlorate- used in fireworks, auto-airbags and safety flares, can cause cancer and thyroid disruption

Chlorine- routinely added to water as a disinfectant, also the easiest contaminant to remove

Trace pharmaceuticals and Personal care products- prescription drugs, steroids, antibiotics, pesticides and other chemicals are not removed by most municipal water treatment methods. I do not want to take statins or antidepressants, but they can be forced on us through the tap water we drink. 

Fluoride- an industrial waste product that causes brittle bones, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, dental fluorosis (mottling), lowered IG in growing children and many other problems, recent reduction measures have been proposed for lowering the amount added to drinking water
http://www.fluoridealert.org/

For more contaminants you can check out the EPA's website

Most tap water quality reports can be accessed online. One website that is helpful is 

However, you might find some areas are missing. In that case, you can normally just search for your city on Google and find out where the water comes from and obtain a quality report. The reports are normally done annually, but water quality can vary throughout the whole year. Some people choose to buy filters specifically calibrated to the contaminants their city has the most of (such as lead), but I think that is less of a worry with a high quality filter that removes almost everything.



Saturday, June 9, 2012

Water Troubleshooting

I am planning a longer post about tap water in general, but first I wanted to share my story about setting up a water purifier in our new home. 

In NYC, I used a small counter-top reverse osmosis filter from Crystal Quest. It worked pretty well, certainly not as well as a larger version, but it was very small and convenient for our tiny apartment. We used the pitchers for a couple of years before I became concerned about fluoride, so that is why I opted for the counter-top RO. As it was easy to take off the sink and install on another one, so I just planned on installing it on the sink in the new place.
However, this did not prove an easy task. First off, the only sink I could really install it on was in the bathroom. We are staying with an older relative (could not install it where she could see it... too much to explain, too hard for her to use, etc.), but the whole downstairs floor is ours, it just does not have a kitchen. It has one larger commercial sink, but the spout was too wide for the RO. So on to the bathroom sink it goes, after straining some time to get the bottom part of the spout off. Big mistake! It leaked everywhere and sprayed us constantly. 

This was pretty upsetting to me. I believe in access to clean, purified water. It is one of the guidelines of the WAPF diet, http://www.westonaprice.org/basics/dietary-guidelines, and very necessary to living a more "clean" life in this toxic world. When I travel, which has been happening more lately, but normally only a few times a year, I buy bottled water. I know, and I feel very bad about it, but I also think it is a decent temporary measure as long as I do my best to make sure the bottles are recycled and try to buy BPA free bottles (Penta is a good one). But since we traveled a lot in May, mostly for our honeymoon and moving, I was sick of the bottles and eager to have my own water source again. 

So I was trying to get to sleep that night thinking of what I was going to do when I wake up thirsty in the morning (my husband took the RO off the sink immediately). I woke up and put it back on the sink and figured we would deal with the splatter until I could find a better solution (husband rolled his eyes, but did not argue).

My friend's mother had recently purchased a distiller that she was very happy with. The nice thing about it was that it did not have to be linked with any sink, only a power outlet. I thought that might be a good solution, but was concerned because I had always heard that, in order to remove fluoride, a purifier needed a reverse osmosis component. I did a little research online and also wrote to the company, Nutriteam, and they assured me that distillation was a very effective method of removing fluoride and that the water is 99-100% pure after distillation. So I ordered one from amazon. I actually had to leave town for a few days (ugh again), and it was here when I returned.

All in all, I can say I am very happy with it. My husband likes the water much better and thinks it is the cleanest he has ever tasted. I does require a lot more work then an RO and is loud. But it does not make any more noise than a fan would, so it just fades in the background as white noise to us. It does have to be cleaned regularly as well. We run it about twice a day, sometimes three times (it makes a gallon every 5-6 hours), and I use the water for cooking and soaking grains as well as drinking and hot beverages but it is enough once I got used to running it frequently. I ordered two pitchers, although they are pretty expensive, to make it easier to run it back to back. I could see needing a larger one, or even two, for a bigger family.

This whole experience taught me, even more so, that good health can require work and time, but the rewards can be well worth it. I could not live without clean water anymore. Unfortunately, our country does not provide clean water and also adds many harmful substances to the water it does provide. There are many other options that are good for other people too such as home delivery spring water or other types of filters. What do you use? Has your experience been as crazy as mine?

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Blog Creation: A Short Story


Since this is my first post, I thought I would tell everyone a little about why I am creating a blog and explain the theme for it...
For a long time, probably since about high school, I have been interested in organic farming and natural food. However I did not ever think about local food and most of my interest in food was centered around being a vegetarian. A few years later, while earning a BS in Nutrition, I discovered a book called "Real Food" by Nina Planck. All of a sudden, a whole new world was opened up for me. I started eating meat (slowly, but surely) and starting going to the NYC farmers markets weekly. I also started to regard a good majority of the information I was learning in my university nutrition program as incorrect (still do). But, the science I learned was very valuable and actually helped me further understand why most modern nutrition is incorrect. 
 -side note: there are very good alternative nutrition programs, I was just not in one : (

I would like to share my journey with people because I do think people, in general, benefit from others experiences. However, I do not plan on being a strictly nutritional blog. I actually am more interested in putting my beliefs and attitude about food towards other aspects of my life.

Let me explain. Lots of us buy local, small production food (yey!). But for me (and this is probably more obvious to many others), I have not been putting that focus onto other purchases and lifestyle choices. I have bought clothes made very far away and in an unethical manner. Ditto for shoes, makeup... lots of other things. My long term plan is to slowly start to amend my ways by becoming more aware of, really, everything I do. I do not plan on changing overnight and I also plan to explore many options...and write about them all.

Also, since I have recently moved from a very local product centered city to a big sprawling one, it will probably be a long journey for me in terms of figuring out where to shop and how to acquire nourishing food. I plan to document that as well, and also maybe get to interview some farm owners along the way. I also plan on doing more things for myself and for me and my husband's little home, as we have more space and a higher quality of home life than we did in our tiny Manhattan apartment.  So that is my concept for returning to a smaller production or "cottage" way of life. Learning to be happy with myself and my decisions and hoping others will help me along the way.

Recommended reading: Real Food by Nina Planck
Nourishing Traditions by Sally Fallon 
Folks this ain't normal by Joel Salatin